What Is the Shape of a Wheel in the Fourth Dimension?

In 1909, the renowned magazine Scientific American held a contest where authors were called to submit articles answering the question "What is the fourth dimension?" The magazine received more than two hundreds essays, a respectable quantity for such an obtuse subject at that time.

The judge in charge to select the best articles was Dr. Henry Parker Manning (1859-1956), a mathematics professor at Brown University. Manning was a specialist in non-traditional geometries and algebras like non-Euclidean geometry and quaternions.

One of the rules of the contest was that the articles should not be greater than 2500 words; thus the essays were going be medium sized in length. Another rule was that the essays should be submitted with pseudonyms instead of the true author name. Since each author was writing independently of the others, and from different countries, some repetitions in concepts were inevitable.
Readings of "The Fourth Dimension Simply Explained".
Readings of The Fourth
Dimension Simply Explained
Out of the large amount of essays, Dr. Manning edited a book of what he considered the best 22 articles, and wrote an Introduction for them where he exposed his view of some of the articles selected, and even corrected some misconceptions about transformations and manipulations of objects in the fourth dimensions, like turning gloves inside-out. The book was published under the title: The Fourth Dimension Simply Explained.

Reproduced below is the discussion of Manning about what should be a wheel in four-dimensional space.
A wheel of four-dimensional matter, in two dimensions of the shape of a circle and in the other two dimensions very small, would have for axis a flat plate instead of a rod. This axial plate could extend indefinitely in all the directions of its plane without any interference with the wheel. The wheel can slip all around over the axial plate unless held to some position on it, just as with us a wheel may slip along on its axis unless held to some position on it. We may suppose that in a three-space we can see the axial plate and a pair of opposite radii (spokes) of the wheel, appearing to us entirely separate; in this way we can see a two-dimensional hole. Or we can see the entire wheel with a hole through it and an axial rod, cut from the axial plate by our three-space.
Manning included no figures to clarify his ideas, but we can suppose that what he did is that in the same way that a line (an axis) projected into the next dimension would produce a plane, he deduced that an axis holding two wheels, when projected into the next dimension would become a plane. It is not easy to visualize two linked rotating wheels in 4D where their common axis is a plane, but anything about the fourth dimension is not easy.

But Manning goes further and writes:
We can fasten the wheel rigidly to the axial plate so that it will turn with the wheel, the wheel turning in its plane and the plate turning on itself. We may put more than one wheel on an axial plate, putting different wheels at different points on the plate wherever we please. If these wheels are all fastened rigidly to the axial plate we turn them all by turning one. Thus we have a method of constructing machinery in space of four dimensions.
If this is not enough to dazzle your mind, wait until you read this:
The axial plate may itself be a wheel. We may fasten two wheels together at their centers making them absolutely perpendicular to each other. Such a figure can revolve in two ways, the plane of one wheel being the axis plane of the rotation and the plane of the other wheel the rotation plane.
Dr. Manning should be speaking from a strictly mathematical point of view; he cannot be fantasizing about higher dimensions. However in the past article The strange extraterrestrial worlds of Camille Flammarion, in the paragraphs about the controvertible Flammarion's woodcut, I called to the attention to the enigmatic solid wheel that appears at the top of the "woodcut" (the woodcut figure is repeated here). Note how in this woodcut, the two intersecting wheels are drawn like two classic ox cart wheels. Possibly, when the artist carved this --let's call it, cross-wheel, or super-wheel-- he was not thinking about a fourth dimension, he needed not to. What he tried to convey was the idea that beyond the spheres that limit our imagination many things can coexist even when they appeared to be contradictory to our senses. Hence, for this artist, wheels that can move in two directions simultaneously are possible. Manning, speaking without the need to recur to metaphors tells us that this is possible; in a 4-dimensional world.

Adding to his exposition of a 4D-wheel, Manning says:

We might have a spherical wheel; something in three dimensions of the shape of a sphere and its fourth dimension very small. Such a wheel with a one-dimensional hole through it may turn on an axial rod, but its motion is not confined to a definite direction of rotation as is the case with the flat wheel turning in its plane.
An old print depicting the Ezekiel's enigmatic wheels.
 Ezekiel's enigmatic impossible wheels.
Flammarion's woodcut is not the only picture that incorporates a possible 4D-wheel. See that in the next picture there is also the same 4D-wheel element incorporated as part of Ezekiel's vision. In fact, the origin of this idea or metaphor comes from the following verses (Chapter 1 of Ezekiel 15-18 ) of the book of Ezekiel in the Bible:
"As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like topaz, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not change direction as the creatures went. Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around."
Continuing with Manning's Introduction see the following"
A spherical wheel may be used for vehicles. If four dimensional beings lived on a four-dimensional earth; that is, alongside of its three-dimensional boundary, a vehicle with four or more wheels of either kind could be used in traveling over this earth. With a flat wheel he could travel only in a straight line without friction between the wheel and the earth; with a spherical wheel he could travel in any direction in a plane without such friction, but would meet with a slight friction in turning from one plane to another.

Download the free ebook: Readings of The Fourth Dimension Simply Explained.

We have discussed so far the Introduction that Dr. Henry P. Manning wrote to the book The Fourth Dimension Simply Explained. The edition that Datum is giving for free contains many essays about the fourth dimension that you will surely enjoy. Download it now!


Selected Puzzles from Henry E. Dudeney

Henry E. Dudeney (1857-1930) was an English logician and mathematician that specialized in creating and collecting puzzles.

An image from '44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes'.
Two men arguing about how much liquid
is in a closed barrel without opening it.
Amusements in Mathematics, published by 1917 is a great collection of geometrical, chessboard and magic square problems.

The free E-book that I am offering you now is titled: 44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes from Henry E. Dudeney. The puzzles are a hand-picked selection of the most "attractive" puzzles in the sense that some of Dudeney's problems are verbal, others are about chessboards, dominoes, etc., but this selection is all about those with some graphical appeal.

Download the free ebook: 44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes from Henry E. Dudeney for free.
Click here

As an example of the EBook content take The Barrel Puzzle, one of the Dudeney's ingenious puzzle included in the EBook.

The puzzle goes like this

The men in the illustration are disputing over the liquid contents of a barrel. What the particular liquid is it is impossible to say, for we are unable to look into the barrel; so we will call it water. One man says that the barrel is more than half full, while the other insists that it is not half full. What is their easiest way of settling the point? It is not necessary to use stick, string, or implement of any kind for measuring. I give this merely as one of the simplest possible examples of the value of ordinary sagacity in the solving of puzzles. What are apparently very difficult problems may frequently be solved in a similarly easy manner if we only use a little common sense.
Clearly, this is a situation we may encounter some day. He clearly says that the content of the barrel does not matter: it can be oil, petroleum, wine, or—as he says—water. Therefore, the problem is related with the geometry or configuration of the barrel. If the barrel need not be opened, then by the common sense he mentions, the only possible action is to tilt the barrel to "see" what happens.

One of the  puzzles from '44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes'.There lies the solution: we have to slowly tilt the barrel until the liquid level is in "correct" position. In his own words:

All that is necessary is to tilt the barrel as in Fig. 1, and if the edge of the surface of the water exactly touches the lip a at the same time that it touches the edge of the bottom b, it will be just half full. To be more exact, if the bottom is an inch or so from the ground, then we can allow for that, and the thickness of the bottom, at the top. If when the surface of the water reached the lip a it had risen to the point c in Fig. 2, then it would be more than half full. If, as in Fig. 3, some portion of the bottom were visible and the level of the water fell to the point d, then it would be less than half full.
This method applies to all symmetrically constructed vessels.
Cover image of the EBook: 44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes.
44 Selected Puzzles and Pastimes.

Download this EBook; all the problems are illustrated and perhaps you can make your own modifications.